You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 17 Next »

Team

Project owner:

Kucera @Hillebrand @

Team members:

Anne Strack @

Other Researchers:

...

Feedbacks

...


Status

ACTIVE 


Project Details

Project Description

Over the last 600 ka, Ear­t­h’s cli­ma­te is do­mi­na­ted by chan­ges in the or­bi­tal geo­me­try (ec­centri­ci­ty) cau­sing gla­ci­al-in­ter­gla­ci­al cy­cles with a fre­quen­cy of ap­pro­xi­mate­ly 100 ka. The­se cy­cles are asym­metri­cal mea­ning long gla­ci­al pe­ri­ods are fol­lo­wed by ra­pid war­mings. Du­ring the­se tran­si­ti­ons – also re­fer­red to as de­gla­cia­ti­ons – the glo­bal cli­ma­te is ra­pidly chan­ging on a mul­ti-mill­en­ni­al-sca­le which ma­kes the­se time pe­ri­ods ide­al to stu­dy po­ten­ti­al ad­ap­ta­ti­on to en­vi­ron­men­tal chan­ge.

Ma­ri­ne plank­ton are of fun­da­men­tal im­port­an­ce when it co­mes to the un­der­stan­ding of the pace and im­pacts that cli­ma­te chan­ge will have on this pla­net. The­re are not only se­veral feed­back me­cha­nisms which high­light the abili­ty of ma­ri­ne plank­ton to cont­ri­bu­te to glo­bal cli­ma­te, but ma­ri­ne plank­ton are also very good in­di­ca­tors for cli­ma­te chan­ge its­elf. They of­ten have short live cy­cles and show a high evo­lu­tio­na­ry di­ver­gence; thus, it ap­pears that plank­ton dy­na­mics may be tight­ly cou­p­led to en­vi­ron­men­tal chan­ge. Also, ma­ri­ne plank­ton – by its de­fi­ni­ti­on – is free floa­ting, so en­vi­ron­men­tal chan­ge might be re­cor­ded by plank­ton dis­tri­bu­ti­on chan­ges and shifts in their geo­gra­phi­cal ran­ge.

A ba­sic goal of the pre­sent PhD pro­ject is to be­ne­fit from the vast amount of plank­ton as­sem­bla­ge data that have been pu­blis­hed in en­vi­ron­men­tal data ar­chi­ves such as PAN­GAEA and NCEI and to uti­li­ze the­se data to bet­ter un­der­stand the va­ria­bi­li­ty in na­tu­ral time sca­les. In par­ti­cu­lar, this PhD pro­ject aims to spa­ti­al­ly and tem­pora­ri­ly in­ves­ti­ga­te the ra­tes of ad­ap­ta­ti­on of ma­ri­ne plank­ton to en­vi­ron­men­tal chan­ge. For that, as­sem­bla­ge as well as mor­pho­lo­gi­cal data extrac­ted from the fos­sil re­cord will be ana­ly­sed.


Duration:

1.2.2019-31.01.2022

Problem statement

Understanding the response of marine ecosystems to climate change requires knowledge of processes that operate over long time scales. Over the last decades, abundant data have been generated on the change in the composition of marine microplankton assemblages across the last deglaciation. These data were used to reconstruct various aspects of the ocean and climate system during this climatic upheaval; however, their potential to evaluate biotic response to climatic forcing has been rarely explored.

Objective of first manuscript

Yasuhara et al. (2020) showed a compositional shift (latitudinal diversity gradient - LDG) in planktonic foraminifera from low to mid latitudes during the last deglaciation by analysing global census data (ForCenS, MARGO). Since they only looked at two time slices (LGM, pre-industrial), they were not able to analyse the timing of this shift in more detail. However, they assume that this shift probably started after the onset of the postglacial warming around 15 ka ago. Here, we use a data set of planktonic foraminifera records (see description below) to analyse the timing and the nature of this transition.

  • Is this compositional transition rapid or slow?
  • Is it in pace with climate forcing or not?
  • What is the pattern of community transformation?

Working Area

North Atlantic Ocean

Data set

We compiled records of plankton response to the last deglaciation covering the entire North Atlantic Ocean. The records comprise assemblage composition data of marine zooplankton (planktonic foraminifera; n = 25) and phytoplankton (coccolithophores and dinoflagellate cysts; n = 5 and 6, respectively) covering the last 24 ka with a resolution of at least 1 ka. The comparability of the data is ensured as follows: For all sites, which are included in the PALMOD 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis V1.0 (Jonkers et al., 2020), the provided revised age models are used. For all other sites, which are not included in this synthesis, the same approach was used to revise the published age models to ensure the comparability of all analysed sites.

Overview map of compiled records















References

Jonkers, L., Cartapanis, O., Langner, M., McKay, N., Mulitza, S., Strack, A., & Kucera, M. (2020). Integrating palaeoclimate time series with rich metadata for uncertainty modelling: strategy and documentation of the PalMod 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis. Earth System Science Data, 12(2), 1053–1081. doi:10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020

Yasuhara, M., Wei, C.-L., Kucera, M., Costello, M. J., Tittensor, D. P., Kiessling, W., … Kubota, Y. (2020). Past and future decline of tropical pelagic biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23), 12891–12896. doi:10.1073/pnas.1916923117


Results

Preliminary results of first manuscript

We used the records of the planktonic foraminifera data set to first determine the shape of the major compositional change in each record by principle components analyses. The mean global response of the plankton to the deglaciation was then evaluated by an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis of the main biotic trends across all sites.

We find that the dominant response of the zooplankton consists of synchronous unidirectional shifts initiated between 16-17 ka BP, and progressing into the Holocene. When regressed on the global ocean temperature and CO2 trends, we can see a proportionate response to the forcing during the last glacial maximum, the deglaciation and the early Holocene. In contrast, the late Holocene is characterised by continued compositional change, which does not appear related to environmental forcing. We speculate that this decoupling indicates the existence of a multi-millennial delay in community change following the climatic forcing.

Figure explanation:

The different rows of this plot correspond to changes in different community metrics (1. richness, 2. gains, 3. losses) calculated for each individual site. The first column shows the data as density plots and the second column shows the same data as box plots separated by the specific plankton groups. The third column shows the change of the specific community metric in a geographical context.

Overview of site-specific community metrics of North Atlantic Ocean data set

We calculated changes in community metrics (richness, gains and losses) for each record of the North Atlantic Ocean data set for the last 24 ka. This overview plot shows consistent change in the flora/fauna such as increasing number of species at mid latitudes and decreasing number at low latitudes. Furthermore, the change in species gains is most prominent at mid latitudes whereas most species losses during the last deglaciation occur at low latitudes. This change could reflect species moving, but could also imply formation of new communities (i.e. with different composition than found anywhere).

Methods:

Richness change: Species richness (# of species) for each sample at each site. The site-specific change is then calculated as the slope of the linear model.

Gains/losses change: Species gains and losses (in percent) as the proportion of species either gained or lost relative to the total number of species observed across both time periods (always compared to the oldest sample in the record). Note: the species gains/losses take actual species identity into account, it’s not only the change in # of species. The site-specific change is then again calculated as the slope of the linear model.

NOTE: A negative slope (red colour in geographical maps) in e.g. richness change means that the number of species increased from the LGM to recent times. It’s kind of counter-intuitive, but it’s because of the x-axis (time). However, for a better intelligibility, this can be easily changed.

Gridded Hovmoller plots for richness [# and %], Shannon and Inverse Simpson diversity expressed as residuals from LGM mean

  • Top row: richness [x and %]
  • Bottom row: Shannon and Inverse Simpson diversity
  • Red colours: positive residuals
  • Blue colours: negative residuals


  • Tropical diversity dip not visible in species richness, but in abundance based diversity measures
  • Species richness is barely changing throughout the last 24 ka in the tropics, but the allocation patterns start to change from 18-15 ka
  • Most change at mid latitudes: big drop between 18-15 ka (Heinrich event?) followed by increase that surpasses the LGM state

Presentations



Publications




  • No labels